www.portierramaryaire.com

Orel escribió:Y no me extrañaría ver un F-35 con cierta capacidad SEAD mejorada.

...
Lt Col Watkins continued: “Some of the advanced SAMs [surface-toair missiles] that are out there, if we’d had anything like that in the scenario [in previous years] we’d concentrate on just going after that one SAM, and we’d put all our effort into that. We’d have to launch a lot of standoff weapons and peel it back from there.

“In this Red Flag we’ve seen three or four of those advanced SAMs in one scenario. We don’t know necessarily where they’re at, so we can’t simulate hitting them with standoff weapons before the vul [vulnerability period] even starts.

“So we’re locating them, and that’s an integrated, cross-domain approach using cyber, using space and assets like the Rivet Joint and the Wedgetail, fusing all that information together to find a target location.

“Between the Block 50s [F-16s] and the F-35s we’re finding that location and are able to use some of the F-22 standoff [capability] as well as the stealth capability of the F-35 to get close enough to those targets where we can drop on them.

“It would be impossible for even a Block 50 to target that missile system from their aircraft as it would be too dangerous for them to get that close.”
...
“Against the complex integrated air defence systems [IADS] we’re able to go out and find their general location before using our synthetic aperture radar to map to determine where the SAM site is. We carry two GBU-31 JDAMs [Joint Direct Attack Munitions], so can put a 2,000lb bomb on the site.

“In my previous experience as an F-16 guy we just used to try and shoot HARMs [AGM-88 High-speed Anti-Radiation Missiles], which have smaller warheads and are not necessarily as capable. Now, with the F-35, we’re able to find the particular site and put down a 2,000lb bomb, which is usually more effective against an IADS.”
...

“Against the complex integrated air defence systems [IADS] we’re able to go out and find their general location before using our synthetic aperture radar to map to determine where the SAM site is. We carry two GBU-31 JDAMs [Joint Direct Attack Munitions], so can put a 2,000lb bomb on the site.

En Red Flag 17-1 se entrenaban en SEAD tirando bombas de 2.000lb, y a pesar de eso demostraron ser mucho más efectivos que los F-16 con HARM

Orel escribió:No sé si será un cambio estandarizado en la flota o sólo de algunos que serán "especializados". Voto por lo ultimo, por ejemplo con el NGJ (Next Generation Jammer) adaptado.

Tercio norte escribió:pero que despues en operaciones reales vas a asegurar al maximo y exponer el minimo me parece una obviedad, pero nada.... seran cosas mias

polluelo escribió:

Tercio norte escribió:pero que despues en operaciones reales vas a asegurar al maximo y exponer el minimo me parece una obviedad, pero nada.... seran cosas mias

Pues si, son cosas tuyas. ¿Has escuchado o leido alguna vez eso de "en tiempo de paz la seguridad es lo primero, en combate lo primero es la misión"?.

En tiempo de guerra no se trata de asegurar al máximo exponiendo el mínimo sino de asegurar al máximo exponiendo todo lo que sea necesario. Mucho mas que en los ejercicios de manera que una sola perdida en un ejercicio es inasumible mientras que en tiempo de guerra es lo que hay.

No se trata de un videojuego sino de algo en lo que de verdad muere gente.