Moderadores: Lepanto, poliorcetes, Edu, Orel
Creo haberlo visto en otro foro, pero por si acaso.
Proyecto TEMPEST. Propuesta de BAE futuro caza
- TEMPEST, de momento británico e italiano y puede que ¿sueco?
Turco y coreano no entran ni en concurso
efas t5 o 6 o X con todo lo que pueda tener un 5° en electronica o mas pero sin furtividad, que dicho sea de paso a lo mejor en X años ni es lo mas importante.
seran 5°, si se quiere 5°++ como los efas y rafale 4°+++, pero saltarnos una generacion y adelantarnos a los americanos en la 6°...... puede que sea mucho, no??
Defeating modern air defenses is achievable with smart strategies, not only stealth and standoff
Former head of Air Combat Command, Gen. John Michael Loh, has written this op-ed on why the USAF should not focus on just operating in contested airspace using stealth aircraft and standoff weapons.
...Now, apparently, USAF planners believe the air defenses of Russia and China are so severe that only new stealth aircraft and long-range cruise missiles can deal with their contested airspace. Accordingly, aircraft like JSTARS, AWACS, RC-135 Rivet Joint, MC-130 Compass Call, legacy fighters and bombers, including the B-2, cannot operate without heavy attrition. The new guiding principle of air campaign planning asserts that forces must operate continuously in contested airspace, replacing rollback strategies that rapidly gain and permanently maintain total control of the air...
[Gen. John Michael] Loh argues that the service has forgotten on applying “classic air power tactics” to rollback heavily-defended airspace into uncontested airspace. He pointed out the effectiveness of USAF rollback strategies, and how it was demonstrated during Operation Desert Storm and again by the Israelis over the Bekaa Valley in 1982.
Baghdad and major military facilities in Iraq were defended by the modern French KARI air defense network [IADS]. Defense “experts” warned against attacking Iraq and of predicted attrition (losses per combat sorties flown) of 15-20 percent. We rolled back the Iraqi IADS, destroyed its airfields and gained uncontested control of the air in three days of around-the-clock attacks with an attrition rate less than 1 percent! The same result happened in the rollback air campaign of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003.
...The Israeli Air Force faced a modern Soviet-supplied IADS in the Bekaa Valley manned by Syrians similar to that facing NATO in Warsaw Pact countries. Despite predictions of heavy Israeli F-15 and F-16 attrition, the IAF, using USAF rollback tactics, destroyed the entire threat array with zero losses in two days, ensuring uncontested air dominance thereafter.
Air attrition analysts have historically overstated air losses because their models do not replicate all countermeasures, decoys, cyber measures, the sheer numbers of swarming attackers, on-scene decisions by smart aircrews and the ability to shift tactics as the air situation develops.
...To be sure, stealth fighters, bombers and standoff weapons must be a large part of the USAF for any future air campaign. But air forces need not be entirely stealthy nor exclusively standoff to execute effective rollback strategies like Desert Storm, Operation Iraqi Freedom and that of Bekaa Valley. Moreover, the numbers of stealth and standoff forces needed would be unaffordable. However, with rapid rollback of defenses, non-stealthy combat and support aircraft can operate with only occasional opposition, and all ground and sea forces likewise. Contested airspace becomes uncontested airspace.
Our Air Force has visionary leaders whose challenge is to learn from past air campaigns, exploit the limitations of modern IADS, understand the mismatch between paper attrition and the realities of combat, invest in the right set of affordable forces, and recognize the value of rapid rollback to create permanently uncontested airspace. This will ensure that today’s Air Force can do what past Air Forces have always done — gain and maintain control of the air quickly and decisively.
https://www.defensenews.com/digital-sho ... -standoff/
http://alert5.com/2018/08/10/john-lohs- ... -airspace/
Orel escribió:[url]Los efectos del caza Tempest:
https://www.infodefensa.com/es/2018/08/ ... empest.php[/url]
Bong ,Dick Bong escribió:
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: No hay usuarios registrados visitando el Foro y 0 invitados